| General note |
It includes Acknowledgement and Introduction Pages.<br/><br/>Description:<br/>This illuminating two-volume collection presents leading articles on the theory and practice of intellectual property law as it applies to the promotion of innovation in economic, social, and legal dimensions. Topics include the role of law and incentives, cumulative and open forms of innovation, as well as discussion of its social dimensions, relationship with market institutions and how to chart a course for future innovation policy. Together with an original introduction by the editor, this collection offers a compelling overview of the ideas that ignite and enliven innovation scholarship, invaluable to academics and policymakers alike.<br/><br/>Volume II<br/><br/><br/>Contents<br/><br/>Volume-II<br/><br/>Introduction An introduction to both volumes by the editor appears in Volume I<br/><br/>PART I SOCIAL DIMENSIONS OF INNOVATION<br/>1. Doris Estelle Long (2008), ‘Crossing the Innovation Divide’, Temple Law Review, 81 (2), Summer, 507–43<br/><br/>2. Anupam B. Jena, Stéphane Mechoulan and Tomas J. Philipson (2010), ‘Altruism and Innovation in Healthcare’, Journal of Law and Economics, 53 (3), August, 497–518<br/><br/>3. Peter Lee (2014), ‘Social Innovation’, Washington University Law Review, 92 (1), 1–71<br/><br/>4. Sofia Ranchordás (2015), ‘Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy’, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 16 (1), 413–75<br/><br/>PART II INNOVATION AND MARKETS<br/>5. Jonathan B. Baker (1999), ‘Promoting Innovation Competition through the Aspen/Kodak Rule’, George Mason Law Review, 7 (3), Spring, 495–521<br/><br/>6. Tim Wu (2006), ‘Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions’, Virginia Law Review, 92 (1), March, 123–47<br/><br/>7. Timothy O’Hearn (2008), ‘Guarding Profits from Innovation: Successful Intellectual Property Strategies’, DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal, 6 (3), Spring, 433–50<br/><br/>8. Jonathan M. Barnett (2009), ‘Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes’, Yale Law Journal, 119 (3), December, 384–456<br/><br/>9. John D. Harkrider and Russell M. Steinthal (2011), ‘The Open Source Paradox: Innovation in the Absence of Exclusive Property Rights’, Competition Law International, 7 (2), November, 38–41<br/><br/>10. Robert W. Gomulkiewicz (2012), ‘Fostering the Business of Innovation: The Untold Story of Bowers v. Baystate Technologies’, Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts, 7 (4), Spring, 445–66<br/><br/>11. Michael A. Carrier (2012), ‘Copyright and Innovation: The Untold Story’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2012 (4), November, 891–962<br/>12. Colleen Chien (2014), ‘Startups and Patent Trolls’, Stanford Technology Law Review, 17 (2), Winter, 461–505<br/><br/>PART III INNOVATION POLICY<br/>13. Marlynn Wei (2007), ‘Should Prizes Replace Patents? A Critique of the Medical Innovation Prize Act of 2005’, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 13 (1), Winter, 25–45<br/><br/>14. Jay P. Kesan (2009), ‘Transferring Innovation’, Fordham Law Review, 77 (5), April, 2169–223<br/><br/>15. Gaia Bernstein (2010), ‘In the Shadow of Innovation’, Cardozo Law Review, 31 (6), June, 2257–312<br/><br/>16. Sarah Tran (2012), ‘Prioritizing Innovation’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 30 (3), Spring, 499–557<br/><br/>17. Miguel Ángel Bernal Blay (2014), ‘The Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Support of Innovation’, European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review, 9 (1), 3–11<br/><br/>18. Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (2015), ‘Nanotechnology and Innovation Policy’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 29 (1), Fall, 33–75<br/><br/>19. Camilla A. Hrdy (2015), ‘Commercialization Awards’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2015 (1), 13–86<br/><br/>20. Tal Z. Zarsky (2015), ‘The Privacy-Innovation Conundrum’, Lewis and Clark Law Review, 19 (1), 115–68<br/><br/>Index |
