A rule of property for Bengal : an essay on the idea of permanent settlement / Ranajit Guha.
Material type:
- 9788178244822 :
- 333.3095414 GUH 23rd
- KNT3117 .G84 1982
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference Book | VIT-AP Reference | 333.3095414 GUH (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan | GEN | 022056 |
Browsing School of Business & General Section shelves, Shelving location: Reference Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
330.954 TOM The Economy of Modern India : From 1860 to the Twenty-First Century | 332.178028 DRE Blockchain basics : a non-technical introduction in 25 steps / | 332.178028 DRE Blockchain basics : a non-technical introduction in 25 steps / | 333.3095414 GUH A rule of property for Bengal : an essay on the idea of permanent settlement / | 336 ROB Handbook of Public Sector Economics / | 338.5 DWI Macroeconomics : Theory and Policy | 338.5 PIN Microeconomics |
Originally published: Paris : Moulton, 1963.
Includes index.
“. . . a pioneering work on the intellectual origins
of [the Permanent Settlement]”—Holden Furber (1964)
The infamous Permanent Settlement of Bengal in the eighteenth century was the most disputed step in the agrarian field ever taken in India under British rule. Why did it happen? Written with uncommon elegance, Ranajit Guha’s classic study—a pioneering work in Indian intellectual history—provides the answers by looking at the ideas and thinking of the policy-makers who radically changed the way in which India was taxed and ruled.
Guha considers why European ideas about capitalism in farming and methods of revenue collection were thrust upon a colonial society. He shows that British administrators such as Lord Cornwallis and Philip Francis were far more considerably influenced by the French Physiocrats than by Indian conditions on the ground. He elaborates on the philosophical antecedents of the Settlement in the works of Alexander Dow, Henry Pattullo, and Philip Francis, outlining the contradictions between their views and those of Warren Hastings.
This third, attractively re-set, edition of a seminal work that has been in print since 1963 includes two new essays by Partha Chatterjee and Rudrangshu Mukherjee. Together, they position this book within Indian historiography and reveal precisely why it remains indispensable for anyone involved in thinking seriously about colonial rule and the making of modern South Asia.
Bibliography: p. [279]-288.
There are no comments on this title.